Thursday, September 3, 2009

Who can say what, politically? It's still being determined

The theme of unfair advantages seems strong lately, which is what this is really about. This is in reference to the case of the anti-Hillary documentary. It will explain the situation if you're unclear on it.

"When the government of the United States of America claims the authority to ban books because of their political speech," says Citizens United, " something has gone terribly wrong."... The government cannot create a pure, balanced, undistorted political debate; all it can do is introduce new distortions. And as bad as distortions caused by wealth (or visibility or good looks or charisma) might seem, distortions imposed by force are worse, which is why the Constitution forbids them. More...

No comments:

Post a Comment